This blog will deal with issues related to electromagnetic and Cellular radiation and it is written by an EHS person (Electromagnetic Hyper Sensitive person).
Please visit our new site: norad4u.com
This is our old blog (until 2008-2019) , we have moved to our new site - https://www.norad4u.com/blog2020/
At 10/08/2019, about 70 people attended the second "stop 5G" protest in Tel Aviv Israel.
The attendees hold signes calling for the promotion of health other then the promotion of 5G networks, about the possible side effects of "smart cities" and other 5G technologies.
from the top to bottom:
"5G , 10 times more radiation!"
"5G is a risk!"
"They just want cash on the expense of the residence"
A video presenting the fight of ORT HOLON parents for the removal of a cell phone mast is available at https://youtu.be/zxDE_di-ThE
In front of ORT HOLON, a High school in the city of HOLON in Israel, a cell phone mast was erected 23 years ago. With the increase of Data usage, the exposure levels of the kids went up every year. last year, the parents noticed that most of the kids (59%) had symptoms that can be related to the RF exposure from the cell phone mast just 20 meters from the school. They conducted a survey that shows 59% of the kids has symptoms. about 19% already visit their doctor in relation to these symptoms. Since the parents understood this is not just one or 2 kids, but most of the kids, they started to fight for the removal of the mast.
Two weeks ago, after a meeting in the Knesset Internal affair and environmental protection committee, 3 antennas that faced the school (outs of a total of 9) were removed. The measured/monitor radiation levels went done just 30%. Side lobes and reflection steel seems to hit the school.
Now the parents call for complete removal of the mast. Yesterday they got the support of the Knesset Education committee that called for the removal of the mast in no more than 3 months.
Today (24/12/2018) I took part in the Knesset Education Committee.
After a 1 hour discussion, the committee called for the removal of all the mast in 3 months.
This is after kids in this scall developed radiation sickness symptoms (about 59% according to a survey done by the parents ).
This is what happens (and will happen again and again) when the standards are based on heat only and are high and non-protective.
Yesterday, the 20/11/2018, together with Prof' Ben Ishay, MD Yael Stain, Itamar Wagner, Batzion Shlomi, Shay Danon, Adit Aaron, I attended a meeting about the "the careless deployment of 5G".
The meeting was called by KM(Knesset Member) Yael Cohen Pharan and lead by KM Uri Makleb.
The video from the meeting is in Hebrew available in the following link, and bellow - https://youtu.be/sV5s_73y8eg
I talked at around 1:32:09 My Main points were: 1. As far as EHS being Nocebo effect, this wrong assumption is based on faulty studies that exposure EHS people to several types of EMF even where there was not supposed to be any exposure, and on studies that exposed EHS people again and again without enough resting time between exposures. 2. As far as the saying that "more cell towers lower the radiation", yes they do so for the radiation from the cell phone but they add environmental radiation which is not measured correctly and not taking into account because it is lower than the so-called safety standards. 3. I explained that most of the people that come to me for help have no idea of what radiation is, how when and from what it is being transmitted and how cellphone tower looks like. So this also roll out nocebo effect. 4. It is possible to reduce exposure in simple steps and it is easy to set up the phone to radiate in lower levels, for less of the time. 5. My main point was that EHS people are being ignored and no one count or calculate the economic toll of their condition in the total economic calculation of deploying and using cellular and wireless technologies. Speakers:
KM Uri Makleb. 00:00
MK Yael Cohen Pharan - 04:14
Adit Aaron - 12:30 - talked about her experience with symptoms of EMF exposure, then cooping with brain cancer and then becoming an activist trying to help others.
Itamar Wagner - 27:30 - talked about the activities against cellphone antennas and about the danger of exposure to RFR.
Md Yael Stain - 32:50 - Talked about EHS, EMF health risk, and effect, about the other voices that say "all is good" and about her medical and scientific history in this field.
Prof Paol Benishay - 1:14:25 - Talked about his findings (in his study of 5G mm-wave frequencies) , about EMF health effect and EHS.
Shay Danon - 1:52:20 - Talked about moving to the far north part of Israel to avoid the radiation, living in a low EMF house, and about our obligation to do the right thing for the sake of our children.
Batzion Shlomy - 1:56:21 - Talked about not using cell phones and wireless devices, about refusing a water smart meter and getting fines. Batzion continued to describe her communication with Prof' Sigal Sedesky about the health risk of RF radiation and cellphone in particular.
According to videos and publications done by the parents of this school students (ages 12-18), it seems that about 60% of the students already suffer from headache, nausea and other symptoms of RF Radiation Sickness. RF Radiation test reports shows average levels of up to 6uW/cm2 in the school.
The parents started a stick.
The City of Holon offered to install Temp RF protection on the windows of the classes that face the antenna. It seems that it brought a 90% reduction in RF levels.
This is possible because the high non-protective RF so called safety standards that allow up to 400-1000 uW/cm2. This is because of the ministry of environment protection policy to comply with ICNIRP standards. Until RF safety standards will be based on Biological damage and health effect of RFR, we will see this happen again and again all over the world.
Videos from the parents protest in front of the school.
The videos are in Hebrew but you can hear the parents shouting slogans to remove the tower and the kids symptoms.
A new Israeli study that was published in the Environmental Research, Volume 163, May 2018, Pages 123-133. The study was done by Michael Peleg, Or Nativ, Elihu D.
The study showed that there were more Hemolymphatic cancers than expected in patients who were exposed to RFR emitting technology (like Radio and Radar). Their age of diagnosis was younger than in all cancer patients and the number of multiple cancer cases was also higher in the study patients than in general cancer patient population.
The study analyzed in detail 47 cancer patients that used to work in the military or industry with and around strong RFR emitting equipment such as radar.
All Patients had cancer.
19 of them had hemolymphatic cancers. That is 40%, while in non exposed cancer patients population the percentage of hemolymphatic cancers is only 23%. 6 patients (12.8%) in this study had multiple primary cancers, as compared with roughtly approximated 2.8% in the general Israeli cancer patients population. The average age of the patients included in this study (when diagnosed with cancer) was 33 years. The average age in which cancer is diagnosed in patients in Israel is 65. Most of the patients' exposure was to RFR with some patients also exposed to ELF. The researches verified that the patient exposure to RFR only exhibited the same high results. The researches then compared their outcomes with other similar studies done in the past. They found very similar association between RFR exposure to hemolymphatic cancers in 4 groups of patients in three countries. The consistent association between RFR exposure and high Hemolymphatic cancer risks, together with other evidence, form a case for causation of the Hemolymphatic and other cancers by RFR. Link to the study - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300045?via%3Dihub
A TV article about EHS was aired tonight (10/03/2018) on Israel CH11 (channel 1). In this report, 2 EHS people (Tamar Arieli Levy, מני בן אריה) that learned to coop with EHS, by knowledge, measurement, exposure reduction and protection, were interviewed, along side with M.D Yael Stein that studies the subject of EHS, and the head of the radiation and noise department in the ministry of environment protection Prof' Stealian gelberg. On the "No Health effect" side, prof' Eitan Freedman was interviewed (and was a little bit softer this time).
