International call for revoking the ICNIRP's mandate and for better standards

A call for better protective standards , revoking the mandate of ICNIRP is made by more than 244 scientists from around the world after ICNIRP ports it's draft for updates on it's Radiofrequency so called safety standards (a quick look reveals nothing is changed, the standards are still note protective of humans , protective of the industry and are based only on heat effect of the radiation).

The letter will be send to the WHO - World Health Organisation.

The letter is avilable at - http://www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/EMF-Call-2018-10-30.pdf
Scientists and NGO can join in and ask their names to be added to the call.

ICNIRP's updated standards - more of the same industry protecting heat based standards.

ICNIRP posted it's draft of updated standards (Radiofrequency so called safety standards).
A quick look reveals nothing is changed, the standards are still note protective of humans , very protective of the industry and are based only on heat effect of the radiation.

Link to the standards draft page - https://www.icnirp.org/en/activities/public-consultation/consultation-1.html

ICNIRP does it again - rejecting the finding of NTP and Ramzini studies that RF radiation may cause and promote cancer

The ICNIRP does it again - rejecting the finding of NTP and Ramzini studies that RF radiation may cause and promote cancer.

Microwave news report that ICNIRP has released a 8 pages note that try to explain why these studies' findings will not effect the old, non protective standard for RF exposure.
By that ICNIRP prove once again that the role it chose to play is to protect the industry from any update of the easy to follow, non protective RF exposure guidelines. These non protective guidelines were written in 1998, that don't cover health and biological damage from RF exposure and that take into consideration only immediate damage from the rise of temperature due to RF exposure.

The trick they use is repeated every once in a while when a new study find evidence that RF radiation exposure can cause or promote cancer or damage health in any other way.
They use the magic words : "inconsistent" and " unreliable"  to undermine the findings while accepting and promoting studies that show a safer picture, even if  provem worn (for example the Danish cohort study)

ICNIRP prove it self once again as the inadequate, baise  and irrelevant.

Therefore I suggest to change "ICNIRP" name to "ICNIRIP".
It is a small change that will bring more "reliability" to the group.

RESONANCE - a Must see movie about Electromagnetic Radiation

Link: http://youtu.be/5vb9R0x_0NQ

This movie is a "must see". It covers many aspects of EMR and EHS. Make time (88 minuets) to see it, or see it part by part, any way make sure you don't miss this!

The movie covers (among other things) the following subjects:

• Frequencies, EMR, natural radiation, biological effect of man made EMR on animals - from 00:00
• EHS, including interviews with too leading EHS activist  Dr Erica Mallery-blythe and Brain Stein - from 00:30
• RF victims and cancer clusters near cellphones' masts - from 47:15
• ICNIRP - 51:00
• Cellphones - from 54:25
• Dr Nora Volkow study about the change of brain activity caused by mobile phone use - 55:00
• SAR - from 57:40
• WHO - "possible carcinogenicity to humans" 2011 - 1:02:00
• Dr Lennart hardell studies - from 1:03:00
• Biologic effect of RF radiation over humans -  1:06:00

and as Douglas Adams wrote: "Share and Enjoy"